Ibangua Investments Limited v Commissioner of Domestic Taxes [2025] KETAT 42 (KLR)
Burden of Proof
“The Tribunal comes to the inescapable conclusion that the Appellant did not discharge its burden of proof as required by providing competent and sufficient documentation to prove the Respondent’s assessment and objection decision wrong, excessive or erroneous.”
Access Restricted Content
Please log in or subscribe to continue reading.
View our pricing plansAlready have a subscription? Sign In
Resource Information
Author |
Firu |
|---|---|
Category |
Litigation Corner, Pleading Aids |
